Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1
M.A. Student in Architectural Engineering, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
2
Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
3
Department of architecture and design, Faculty of architecture, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
Abstract
Historic buildings are vital embodiments of cultural heritage, reflecting the contextual identity, collective memory, and social cohesion of communities across time. Nevertheless, the deliberate demolition of such structures constitutes a profound threat to cultural heritage, frequently driven by contextual institutional shortcomings, economic pressures, and a lack of cultural awareness. This phenomenon leads not only to the irreversible loss of architectural assets but also to the disruption of historical continuity and the weakening of social and cultural fabrics. In the contextual reality of accelerating urbanization and profit-oriented development, there is an urgent need to develop effective policy strategies that prevent intentional demolition. This study addresses the central research question: What contextual policy measures can effectively deter the intentional destruction of historic buildings? By advocating a proactive and integrative preservation approach, this research aims to propose a contextual framework that balances private property rights with collective responsibilities for heritage conservation. The findings underscore the necessity to critically reassess and refine existing conservation policies to more effectively safeguard cultural heritage amid contextual contemporary challenges. Employing a qualitative approach, the research utilizes Thematic Content Analysis (TCA) via MAXQDA 2024 to assess contextual causes, consequences, and policy solutions. Data analysis distilled key themes, revealing that sustainable preservation requires a triadic framework: regulatory enforcement, economic incentives, and cultural awareness strategies. The study concludes that contextual policy responses must integrate legal, economic, and socio-cultural dimensions to effectively mitigate demolition risks. Future research should evaluate these strategies within diverse contextual governance and socio-economic settings.
Keywords
