1.Alexander, C. (1979). The timeless way of building. Oxford fUniversity Press.
2.Bani Masoud, A. (2020). Contemporary architecture in Iran: From 1925 to the present.. ISBN 979-8620711642.
3.Bapiri, J., Esfandiar, K., & Seyfi, S. (2020). A photo-elicitation study of the meanings of a cultural heritage site experience: A means-end chain approach.
International Journal of Heritage Studies, 26(1), 62–78.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873X.2020.1756833.
4.Ching, F. D. K. (2007). Architecture, form, space & order. Hoboken: Wiley.
6.Curtis, W. J. R. (1996). Modern architecture since 1900 (3rd ed., Illustrated ed.). Phaidon Press.
7.Dawoud, M. M., & Elgizawy, E. (2018). The correlation between art and architecture to promote social interaction in public space. In M. K. Dawoud (Ed.) ,
Cities’ identity through architecture and arts (pp. 99–105). Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315166551-9.
8.Dovey, K. (2010). Becoming places: Urbanism / Architecture / Identity / Power. Routledge.
9.Dubois, C., Cloutier, G., Potvin, A., Adolphe, L., & Joerin, F. (2020). Design support tools to sustain climate change adaptation at the local level: A review and reflection on their suitability.
Environmental Modelling & Software, 125, 104612.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104612.
10.Frampton, K. (1992). Modern architecture: A critical history (3rd ed.). Thames & Hudson.
11.Gayen, P., & Hajela, A. (2025). Modern heritage assessment index: A quantitative approach for assessing the cultural significance of modern heritage.
Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 11(2), 123–135.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2025.2502972.
12.Gehl, J. (2011). Life between buildings: Using public space (6th ed.). Island Press.
13.Gerstenberg, T., Baumeister, C. F., Schraml, U., & Plieninger, T. (2020). Hot routes in urban forests: The impact of multiple landscape features on recreational use intensity.
Landscape and Urban Planning, 203, 103888.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103888.
15.Heath, T., Oc, T., & Tiesdell, S. (1996). Revitalising historic urban quarters. Routledge.
16.Hsu, C. & Sandford, B. A., (2007) “The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus”,
Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation 12(1): 10.
https://doi.org/10.7275/pdz9-th90.
17.Karbalaei Hossini Ghiyasvand, A. and Soheili, J. (2019). The Role of Environmental Physical Indicators in Socibility of Cultural Spaces Using Space Syntax Technique, Case Study: Dezfol and Niavaran Cultural Complexes. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 11(25), 361-373.
18.Khosravi, S., & Alavi, N. (2022). Quantitative assessment of architectural aesthetics based on order and complexity: Addressing subjective biases in evaluation.
Journal of Architectural Science and Research, 18(3), 210–225.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasr.2022.04.005.
19.Lang, J. (1987). Creating architectural theory: The role of the behavioral sciences in environmental design. Van Nostrand Reinhold.
20.Maselli, G., Cucco, P., Nesticò, A., & Ribera, F. (2023). Historical heritage–MultiCriteria Decision Method (H-MCDM) to prioritize intervention strategies for the adaptive reuse of valuable architectural assets.
MethodsX, 10, 102487.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2023.102487.
21.Mishra, P. S., & Muhuri, S. (2021). Incorporating perceptions of multiple stakeholders while assessing architectural heritage value: A case of Odishan temple architecture in India.
Journal of Planning Education and Research, 44(3).
https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X211072526.
22.Mishra, P. S., & Muhuri, S. (2021). Value assessment of existing architectural heritage for future generation using criteria importance through inter-criteria correlation and grey relational analysis method: A case of Odisha temple architecture in India.
Current Science, 121(6), 823–833.
https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v121/i6/823-833.
25.Nasr, S. H. (2006). Islamic science: An illustrated study. World Wisdom.
26.Okoli, C., & Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: An example, design considerations and applications.
Information & Management, 42(1), 15–29.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002.
27.Oliver, P. (2003). Dwellings: The vernacular house worldwide. Phaidon Press.
28.Pallasmaa, J. (2005). The eyes of the skin: Architecture and the senses (2nd ed.). Wiley-Academy.
29.Pérez-Gómez, A. (1983). Architecture and the crisis of modern science. MIT Press.
30.Pisolkar, Y. (2024). Cultural heritage management and sustainable development: Major themes and research trajectories.
Journal of Electrical Systems, 20(6s), 2417–2431.
https://doi.org/10.52783/jes.3224.
31.Rahbar, M., MahdaviNejad, M. J., Bemanian, M. R., & Davaie-Markazi, A. (2020). Artificial neural network for outlining and predicting environmental sustainable parameters.
Journal Name,
Volume(Issue), pages.
https://doi.org/10.22061/jsaud.2019.4501.1333
32.Rapaport, A. (1982). The meaning of the built environment: A non-verbal communication approach. Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona Press.
34.Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill.
35.Sagarna, M., Senderos, M., Pérez, J. J., Azcona, L., Otaduy, J. P., Lizundia, I., Roca, M., Martín-Garín, A., Aizpiri, A., & Mora, F. (2025). Globalization and architecture: Urban homogenization and challenges for unprotected heritage.
Buildings, 15(3), Article 497.
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15030497
36.Scruton, R. (1979). The aesthetics of architecture. Princeton University Press.
37.Shaheen, S., Waly, T., & Metawi, R. (2022, December). A process model for architectural heritage values assessment. In Sustainable Conservation of Cultural Heritage, KNUCH UNESCO Chair International Forum. Helwan University.
39.Yau, Y. (2009). Multi-criteria decision making for urban built heritage conservation: Application of the analytic hierarchy process.
Journal of Building Appraisal, 4(3), 191–205.
https://doi.org/10.1057/jba.2008.34
40.Zhao, Q., Zhang, L., & Hou, J. (2025). Developing a cultural sustainability assessment framework for environmental facilities in urban communities.
npj Heritage Science, 13, Article 107.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s40494-025-01662-6