Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD candidate, Department of Architecture, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Architecture, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Industrial architectural heritage, as part of the historical-cultural capital of nations, reflects the process of industrialization and socio-economic developments. Although criteria, charters, and guidelines have been developed internationally for valuing this heritage, little effort has been made to adapt and evaluate these criteria in Iran’s local context. The main research question is: "How can a framework be designed for valuing the industrial architectural heritage of Khorasan Razavi based on international criteria? And how are these reflected in studied examples?" This research aims to develop an efficient framework for valuing the industrial architectural heritage of Khorasan Razavi based on international criteria; a framework designed by identifying and categorizing effective criteria and capable of being tested locally. The approach is interpretive and qualitative, using document content analysis to extract concepts. In the evaluation stage, field analysis based on a questionnaire was used. First, by analyzing scientific sources, charters, and international criteria, a set of components, indicators, and valuation criteria were extracted and integrated. Then, 14 key industrial buildings in Khorasan Razavi were selected and evaluated by experts using a questionnaire based on a five-point Likert scale. Results show most buildings have high economic value but are weak in social value. Findings can serve as a basis for developing assessment tools, conservation decisions, and revitalizing industrial architectural heritage regionally.

Keywords

©2025 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

1.Bertacchini, E., & Frontuto, V. (2023). Economic valuation of industrial heritage: A choice experiment on Shanghai Baosteel industrial site. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4465941.
2.Bertacchini, E., & Frontuto, V. (2024). Economic valuation of industrial heritage: A choice experiment on Shanghai Baosteel industrial site. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 66, 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2023.11.016.
3.Chen, X., Jiang, L., Cheng, B., Zhang, Y., Shi, X. L., Zheng, Y. D., & Fu, Y. (2024). Evaluating urban industrial heritage value using industrial heritage matrix analytic hierarchy process models: A case study of Mawei Shipbuilding in Fuzhou City. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 12(2), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.12.2_99.
4.Claver, J.; García-Domínguez, A.; Sebastián, M.A. (2020). Multicriteria Decision Tool for Sustainable Reuse of Industrial Heritage into Its Urban and Social Environment. Case Studies. Sustainability, 12 (18), 1-25.http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12187430.
5.Darsouei, R. (2018). Development of principles for adaptation and revitalization planning of the Mashhad spinning factory (Master’s thesis, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran).
6.Dell’Ovo, M.; Bassani, S.; Stefanina, G.; Oppio, A. (2020). Memories at Risk. How to Support Decisions about Abandoned Industrial Heritage Regeneration. Valori E Valutazioni, 24, 107–115.
7.Falser, M, (2001), Global Strategy Studies Industral Heritage Analysis. Asia-minja yang: UNESCO World Heritage Center.
8.Giedion, S. (2009). Space, time and architecture (M. Mazini, Trans., 13th ed.). Scientific and Cultural.
9.Goodini, J., & Vafamehr, M. (2019). Providing a comprehensive definition of architecture in the study of industrial complexes with a systemic approach. Iranian Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 10(17).
10.Goudini, J. , Vafamehr, M. , Gorji Mahlabani, Y. and Barati, N. (2016). Evaluation of Iran Architecture Knowledge on Industrial Complexes; In Order to Discover the Challenges and Provide Developmental Strategies. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 13(41), 5-18.
11.Hanachi, P., Azari, A., & Mahmoodkalaye, S. (2013). Value management in historical textures using geographic information systems: A case study of the historical axis of Lalehzar Street. Islamic Iranian Urban Studies Quarterly, (12).
12.He, H. (2021). Design study on the conservation and Reuse of Modern Industrial Building Heritage. In IOP Conference Series: Earth Environmental Science, Vol. 768, No. 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/768/1/012134.
13.Heidari,S. , Heidari,S. , Hanachi,P. and Teymoortash,S. (2025). The Adaptive Reuse of Industrial Heritage, an Approach Based on Energy Recycle. Naqshejahan- Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning, 9(1), 45-53.https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1398.9.1.5.4.
14.Historic Places Initiative, (2011). Developing your Heritage Inventory, A Guide for Communities, Heritage Resources Branch of the Ministry of Tourism, Parks, Culture and Sport, Saskatchewan.
15.ICOMOS, (2013). The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance, https://www.icomos.org/charters.
16.International Congress of Architects and Technicians of Historic Monuments. (1931). The Athens Charter for the Restoration of Historic Monuments. Adopted at the First International Congress of Architects and Technicians of Historic Monuments, Athens, 1931.
17.Iqbal, Naveed, Akbar, Syed Hamid and Koenraad Van Cleempoel, (2022). Identification of Industrial Heritage and a Theoretical Framework for an Industrial Heritage Inventory System in Pakistan, Sustainability, 14, 5797.
18.Jafari, T. (2020). Identifying barriers and proposing an operational framework to enhance the quality of industrial architecture in Iran. Memari Shenasi Journal, 3(15). [In Persian].
19.Liu, F., Zhao, Q., & Yang, Y. (2018). An approach to assess the value of industrial heritage based on Dempster–Shafer theory. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 32, 210–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2018.01.011.
20.Nocca, F., Bosone, M., & Orabona, M. (2024). Multicriteria Evaluation Framework for Industrial Heritage Adaptive Reuse: The Role of the ‘Intrinsic Value’. Land, 13(8), 1266. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13081266.
21.Pahlevanzadeh, L. (2018). Revitalization and preservation of capabilities and values of the architectural heritage of contemporary industrial factories in Iran. Isfahan University of Art, Faculty of Conservation and Restoration.
22.Riegl, A. (1982). The modern cult of monuments: Its character and its origin. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23.Shahrokhi, S. , Niknami, K. and Izadi, M. S. (2022). The Role of ‘Conservation’ and ‘Dynamism’ in the Revitalisation of Architectural Heritage based on the Continuity of Place-bound Values The Case of Choghaznabil Historic Site. Soffeh, 32(3), 105-124.  https://doi.org/10.52547/sofeh.32.3.105.
24.Sharifi, M. and Talebian, M. H. (2019). Recognizing and Explaining the Values of the Railway Heritage (Case Study: Trans-Iranian Railway). Iranian Journal of Anthropological Research8(1), 75-94.. https://doi.org/10.22059/IJAR.1397.70509.
25.Shirvani, M., Ahmadi, H., & Vatandoost, R. (2016). Recognizing the value and influencing factors in the transformation of value-based approaches in the conservation of cultural heritage in the present century. Journal of Fine Arts – Architecture and Urban Planning, 21(4).39-50. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2017.61655.
26.Standards and Guidelines Standing Committee, (2010). Standards and Guidelines for the conservation of historic places in Canada, second edition, Canada's Historic Places.
27.TICCIH. The Nizhny Tagil Charter for the Industrial Heritage.(2003), p. 4. Available online: https://www.icomos.org/18thapril/ 2006/nizhny-tagil-charter-e.pdf (accessed on 7 November 2018).
28.Ranjkesh,R. and Fadaei Nezhad Bahramjerdi,S. (2025). Adaptation and Reuse of Industrial Heritage as a Continuation of Urban Identity; Tabriz Salambur Factory and Igualada Leather Factory Spain. Naqshejahan- Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning, 10(1), 55-62. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.23224991.1399.10.1.6.2
29.UNESCO/ISSROM/ICOMOS/IUCN, (2022). Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assessment in a World Heritage Context, Paris, UNESCO.